GENDER & SOCIETY · SOUTH AFRICA
Free 15 Min Private Session
GENDER & SOCIETY · SOUTH AFRICA
A man went online to complain that in today's society, he has to be rich just to date women who have no money. He thought he was exposing women. What he actually did was expose himself and the centuries-old system his male ancestors built and enforced.
The provider dynamic is not a modern inconvenience. It is a tradition that stretches back thousands of years. For the majority of human history, men used the law to make it illegal for women to own property, access education, or earn an independent income.
They didn't just benefit from a system, they engineered it. Women were kept financially dependent by design, not by choice. So when a man complains today that he has to be wealthy to date a woman who has no money, he is not exposing a female flaw. He is crying about the direct consequences of a system his great-grandfather built.
Men didn't sign up to be providers out of love or sacrifice. They signed up because being a provider meant a woman was their property. Financial control was how you secured ownership. That was the transaction: men provided, and in return, women belonged to them.
You don't get to build a cage, trap someone inside it, and then complain that feeding your prisoner is too expensive.
Now, centuries later, men are waking up to the financial pressure that role places on them. It is a lot of pressure. But the response has been to blame women for expecting to be provided for, rather than to acknowledge that women were given no other option for most of history.
That's not just historically ignorant. It's a stunning lack of empathy.
When women enter the workforce and demand equal pay, they are called entitled and undeserving. When women stay home and expect to be financially supported (the exact arrangement men created) they are called gold diggers and lazy.
There is no version of a woman's choices that men consistently approve of. That's not a coincidence. It's a control mechanism. When you design a system where every exit a woman takes is wrong, you've set up the perfect trap.
There is a genuine conversation to be had about the pressures of traditional gender roles on men. The expectation that a man must be a financial provider to have worth in a relationship is a real burden — and dismantling it matters.
But that conversation has to start with honesty: women didn't force men into this arrangement. Men enforced it on women through law, violence, and social exclusion for centuries. Acknowledging that history isn't weakness. It's the only foundation on which an equal future can actually be built.
You cannot reform a system you refuse to take responsibility for creating.
Men used law and force to keep women financially dependent for centuries.
Being a provider was historically tied to ownership of women, not generosity or love.
Complaining about the cost of a system you created and women had no choice but to exist within, is not a valid grievance.
Men criticise women for both following traditional roles and for breaking them, revealing that the objection is about control, not fairness.
Acknowledging patriarchy's role in creating dependency is the necessary first step toward genuine gender equality.
Reforming traditional gender roles requires accountability, not blame-shifting.
Disclaimer:
I am not your therapist, attorney, or doctor. I cannot diagnose you, represent you, prescribe anything, or replace professional support. What I can offer in good faith is a thoughtful perspective from someone who understands the social, cultural, and political landscape most of us are navigating in South Africa, without judgment, without an agenda, and without compensation.
The claim that foreigners don't pay tax and therefore shouldn't access public hospitals gets repeated so often that people have started believing it. But this argument is not just false, it's a massive distraction.